Scientific Study: ‘Towers Collapsed Due To Controlled Demolition’

A European clinical study has concluded that on September 11, 2001, the Twin Towers were destroyed by a contorlled demolition.

The research study, conducted by four physicists and published in Europhysics Publication, states that "the evidence points extremely to the conclusion that three buildings were destroyed by contorlled demolition."


" Given the significant ramifications, it is ethically necessary that this hypothesis be the subject of a really clinical and impartial examination by responsible authorities," the 4 physicists conclude.

The study is the work of Steven Jones, previous professor of physics at Brigham Young University, Robert Korol, a proffessor emeritus of civil engineering at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada, Anthony Szamboti, a mechanical design engineer with over 25 years of structural design experience in the aerospace and communications industries, and Ted Walter, the director of strategy and development for Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Reality, a not-for-profit company that today represents more than 2,500 designers and engineers.

Mindful of the questionable nature of the report Europhysics included an editor's note with the research study in the September 2016 problem: "This function is somewhat different from our normal simply scientific posts, in that it includes some speculation. However, given the timing and the value of the issue, we consider that this feature is sufficiently technical and fascinating to merit publication for our readers. Certainly, the material of this short article is the duty of the authors."

In August 2002, the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology introduced what would end up being a six-year investigation of the three structure failures that took place on 9/11. It found both the Twin Towers, along with the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7, which was not struck by an aircraft, all collapsed as an outcome of fires and intense heat. However even the NIST found that the 3 structures were "the only known cases of overall structural collapse in high-rise buildings where fires played a substantial role."

" It bears repeating that fires have actually never ever triggered the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise before or since 9/11," the scientists compose. "Did we witness an extraordinary occasion 3 separate times on September 11, 2001?"

The report likewise concluded: "Provided the far-reaching ramifications, it is morally important that this hypothesis be the topic of a truly scientific and unbiased investigation by responsible authorities."

The researchers likewise discovered "the only phenomenon capable of collapsing such structures completely has been by method of a procedure called controlled demolition, whereby explosives or other gadgets are used to bring down a structure deliberately."

They kept in mind that "15 years after the occasion a growing number of architects, engineers, and scientists are skeptical by that explanation."

Here are some of the observations the scientists provided:

Fires normally do not reach tempretures high enough and do not last long enough in any single area to generate adequate energy to heat the big structural members to the point where they fail (the temperature level at which structural steel loses adequate strength to fail is dependent on the factor of safety used in the design. In the case of WTC 7, for example, the aspect of safety was typically 3 or greater. Here, 67 percent of the strength would have to be lost for failure to follow, which would require the steel to be heated up to about 660 ° C);.
Most high-rises have fire suppression systems (water sprinklers), which prevent a fire from releasing sufficient energy to heat up the steel to a crucial failure state;

Structural members are secured by fireproofing products, which are created to avoid them from reaching failure temperature levels within defined period;.
Steel-framed high-rises are developed to be highly redundant structural systems. Thus, if a localized failure happens, it does not lead to an out of proportion collapse of the whole structure. Throughout history, 3 steel-framed high-rises are known to have suffered partial collapses due to fires; none of those led to a total collapse. Countless other steel-framed high-rises have actually experienced large, lasting fires without suffering either partial or total collapse. In addition to resisting ever-present gravity loads and occasional fires, high-rises need to be created to resist loads produced during other severe events-- in particular, high winds and earthquakes.

The physicists likewise note the Towers were particularly designed to stand up to the impact and damaging force of airliners crashes.

They write:" The overall collapse of WTC 7 at 5:20 pm on 9/11, is remarkable due to the fact that it exemplified all the signature features of an implosion: The building dropped in absolute totally free fall for the very first 2.25 seconds of its descent over a distance of 32 meters or 8 stories. Its transition from tension to complimentary fall was unexpected, happening in roughly one-half 2nd. It fell symmetrically straight down. Its steel frame was nearly completely dismembered and deposited primarily inside the building's footprint, while the majority of its concrete was pulverized into small particles. Finally, the collapse was fast, occurring in less than seven seconds. Offered the nature of the collapse, any investigation adhering to the scientific method need to have seriously thought about the regulated demolition hypothesis, if not begun with it. Instead, NIST (as well as the Federal Emergency situation Management Firm, which performed a preliminary study prior to the NIST examination) began with the predetermined conclusion that the collapse was caused by fires.".

The initial examinations did note: "The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they triggered the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the overall diesel fuel on the facility included enormous possible energy, the very best hypothesis has just a low probability of event.".

On March 2006, the NIST's lead detective, Dr. Shyam Sunder, was quoted as stating, "Truthfully, I do not truly understand. We've had difficulty getting a deal with on structure No. 7.".

" The collapse mechanics talked about above are just a portion of the readily available evidence suggesting that the airplane impacts and coresponding fires did not cause the collapse of the Twin Towers," the report says. "Videos show that the upper area of each tower disintegrated within the first 4 seconds of collapse. After that point, not a single video reveals the upper areas that supposedly came down all the method to the ground before being crushed. Videos and photographs likewise reveal many high-velocity bursts of debris being ejected from point-like sources. NIST refers to these as "puffs of smoke" but fails to effectively analyze them. NIST likewise offers no explanation for the midair pulverization of the majority of the towers' concrete, the near-total dismemberment of their steel frames, or the ejection of those products as much as 150 meters in all directions.”

What are your thoughts? Please share and comment on our Facebook page.

Thanks for taking the time to read this article. If you found this information helpful, please share it with your friends and family. Your support in our endeavor of sharing free information would be much appreciated.

You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Deprogram Yourself