Over 2300 Architects And Engineers Expose Flaws In Official Version Of 9/11





For many of us, the morning of September 11, 2001 will permanently remain seared in our memory. It was a shock that resounded throughout the country, and the world. For those people who saw the disaster unfold that morning, we were forever left with unanswered concerns. Why had it at first been reported as a controlled demolition, and why were people reporting the noises of explosions previously, during, and after the first, and eventual second airplane struck? What took place to these initial reports by that afternoon?

Eyewitness reports from September 11, 2001:

.

Established in 2006 by Richard Gage, a San Francisco Bay location designer:.

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth) is a non-profit non-partisan organization of designers, engineers and affiliates dedicated to exposing the falsehoods and to exposing realities about the complete destruction of all 3 World Trade Center high-rises on September 11, 2001.

Our organization is dedicated to:.


  • Resolving false information and disinformation with scientific truths and forensic evidence.
  • Educating and inspiring countless designers and engineers along with the general public at huge.
  • Obtaining a really independent WTC investigation with subpoena power. 
  • Attaining traditional media protection of our cause.
In a recent interview with C-Span, Richard Gage briefly outlines the organization's goals, as well as talking about the evidence that recommends Structure 7 was destroyed by regulated demolition:

.

The main NIST report on WTC Structure 7 states that it collapsed due to fires triggered from particles from WTC Structure 1, which was located 370 feet to the south.



The particles supposedly fired up at least ten floors on the south and west faces of the building.

“I’ve been in private practice for twenty-five years. I’ve been a practicing engineer for thirty-nine years. Fifty percent of my practice is in forensic engineering. Steel structural frame buildings, high-rise buildings, simply do not collapse due to fire. There has never been, until 9/11, an experience where a high-rise building that was steel-framed completely collapsed. There have been fires burned longer in similar structures without any collapse.” – Scott Grainger, P.E., Forensic Fire Protection Engineer

Buildings can be damaged in a number of methods, including fire, controlled demolition, earthquakes, which can cause buildings to either topple or collapse and explosion. Each force of destruction has its own recognizable set of qualities. Buildings that are damaged by fire behave really differently than those that are damaged by controlled demolition.

In an interview with Teacher Jonathan Barnett of the Worcester Polytechnic Institute and FEMA, Barnett states:.

“When steel is bare, when it heats up, it gets weaker. It’s not that it melts in a fire, in fact normal fires are not hot enough to melt steel. Even if you were, for example, to use an unusual fuel, like kerosene, you cannot achieve temperatures hot enough to melt steel. But what happens is it starts to lose its strength, and as it loses its strength, it starts to sag. It becomes softer, and sags—it can no longer support the load.”

Steel structures that fall apart or fall from fire do so through a long procedure. It takes some time for the steel to heat and droop. This is not exactly what we see when we watch the collapse of WTC Building 7:.

.

David Chandler, Professor of Physics, measured the downward velocity of building 7 utilizing video frame analysis. Placing markers on the corner of the building in each frame of the video, he was able to create an information table which suggested the structure fell at a rate that was indistinguishable from a free-fall. It took 6.5 seconds for WTC Structure 7 to collapse from a complete standing position.

What does this mean? The steel columns of the building gave virtually no resistance. They needed to have actually been gotten rid of, and it needed to have actually been done at the same time-- completely timed-- in order to offer no resistance throughout the entire structure.



Kevin McPadden, Former Air Force Unique Operations for Browse and Rescue-- eyewitness interview concerning WTC 7 on September 11, 2001:.

“…he came back over with his hand over the radio, and what sounded like a countdown. And at the last few seconds he took his hand off and you heard ‘three, two, one,’ and he was just saying, ‘just run for your life, just run for your life.’ And then it was like another two, three seconds you heard explosions.”

In a regulated demolition, some of the core columns throughout the structure are cut at an angle prior to explosives being set. This is to guarantee the building collapses rapidly, easily, and without the resistance of the structural beams. Here's a picture taken from Ground zero:



Aside from that this column has clearly been cut, see the molten metal. If building fires can not burn hot sufficient to melt metal, where did it come from? It has been reported that hot spots of molten steel were discovered under the particles more than a month after September 11th. The spots were located at the bottom of the elevator shafts, and at WTC 7 it ran down 7 levels of the basement. As a suggestion, WTC 7 was not struck by an airplane, and jet fuel-- which doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel anyhow-- was not present.



Structural metal does not begin to melt up until it has reached 2750 ° F (or 1510 ° C). According to official reports, WTC 7 burned at 1200 ° F. What then, explains the presence of molten metal? NIST chooses not to discuss the existence of molten steel totally, nevertheless according to specialists with AE911Truth, a most likely culprit is thermite, which reaches temperatures of 4500 ° F.

“Thermite. An incendiary use by the military, thermite is a compound of iron oxide and aluminum, which when ignited sustains an extreme heat reaction creating molten iron. In just two seconds thermite can reach degrees of over 4500 °F. Quite enough to liquefy steel. We know that open air fires cannot burn hot enough to melt steel, but metal had melted at the base of the towers. Appendix C of the FEMA report describes sulfur residues on the World Trade Center’s steel. The New York Times called this the deepest mystery of all.” – 9/11: Blueprint for Truth, documentary.

Sulfur combined with thermite changes into thermate, which produces even faster outcomes. It also leaves sulfur residues behind. According to area 12-4 of the NFPA 921: Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigations, "Uncommon residues ... might emerge from thermite, magnesium or other pyrotechnic products." Aside from its military ramifications, thermite/thermate is typically used in regulated demolitions.

This large clump of metal and particles, which has actually come to be known as The Meteorite, was discovered amongst the rubble at Ground No:.



Bart Boorsanger, 9/11 artifacts architect, has actually discovered many rock-like developments such as this with really high levels of iron. Aside from that we know this compound was when molten due to the numerous particles and concrete that is mixed within, we likewise understand thermite creates iron, which would describe the high levels of it found in the developments.

A fascinating truth that must be noted and considered is that the Securities and Exchange Commission, which operated from WTC 7, lost countless files related to numerous cases it was actively pursuing against Wall Street business like Enron and WorldCom. Something to chew on.

The information provided in this short article hardly covers the information behind the destruction of WTC Structure 7, and it just scratches the surface area of the examination those with Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Fact have actually been carrying out.

Below are the documentaries, 9/11: Blueprint for Fact-- The Architecture of Damage and 9/11: Dynamite Proof-- Professionals Speak Out, both of which break down, in information, the company's findings.

9/11: Blueprint for Truth – The Architecture of Destruction:

.

9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out:


Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Reality, in partnership with the High-Rise Security Initiative, have actually been actively looking for an official independent investigation into the destruction of all 3 World Trade Center buildings for rather some time. In August of last year the City of New York blocked yet another attempt by the High-Rise Security Effort to appear on the tally by wrongly tough thousands of sent trademarks on the petition.

Recently, however, thanks to a devoted group of activists in Ottawa, Ontario, a petition has actually been presented to your house of Commons requesting a “parliamentary review of the omissions and inconsistencies in the official Unites States of America 9/11 Report.”

While this isn't really the first time AE911Truth have attempted to petition the Canadian government, it is the first time they were successful. This is just due to the fact that the petition was presented by a Member of Parliament who felt it was her task to provide the petition on behalf of individuals. Predictably, when the mainstream media picked up the story, they described it as “a call to support a conspiracy theory.”

However, it provided a chance for activists from across Canada to speak with the country, and on December 10th a press conference was held at the parliamentary press gallery. David Long, author of the petition and a 9/11 survivor, hosted the occasion, while three speakers provided statements that were reported as both "powerful and moving". Isabelle Beenen checked out AE911Truth's statement, Dr. Graeme MacQueen represented the 9/11 Agreement Panel, and Costs Brinnier spoke on behalf of 9/11 victims and their families.

Responses from the media were mixed. According to the original report:.

“Media response following the press conference was quite a mix. Global News presented a full minute of Dr. MacQueen’s statement addressing deficiencies in the official 9/11 investigation, including the fact that testimony of over 150 eyewitnesses who had seen and heard explosions on 9/11 had been ignored. Other news sources provided the usual response, including assertions that ‘the official report explains that the molten metal [flowing from the South Tower just minutes prior to its collapse] was aluminum from the plane’ – even though it couldn’t possibly be so.”


Despite your opinion, whether you believe the theories behind 9/11 are conspiracy or not, the truth is there are a lot of questions that have actually gone unanswered. Considering the magnitude of the catastrophe that occurred on September 11th, 2001, you would believe the federal government would be cooperative in resolving the lots of concerns millions of individuals around the world have actually expressed.

Thanks for taking the time to read this article. If you found this information helpful, please share it with your friends and family. Your support in our endeavor of sharing free information would be much appreciated.


You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Deprogram Yourself