The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), seeking to promote the tranquil usage of Nuclear Power, in 2011 developed with the Regional Cooperative Arrangement (RCA) Member States, a joint IAEA Technical Cooperation (TC) task in the region of the Pacific Ocean. It was established after the Fukushima disaster when a tsunami brought on by a significant earthquake on 11 March 2011, disabled the power supply and cooling of 3 Fukushima Daiichi reactors, causing a nuclear accident. As a result a extremely large quantity of radioactive product was admitted into the Pacific Ocean.
This in turn triggered many issue to nations based around the Pacific Ocean due to the prospective economic and ecological implications. The TC task's aim was therefore, to keep an eye on the presence of radioactive compounds in the marine environment.
The first annual review conference held in August 2012 showed predictive hydrodynamic designs and they predicted that the strong present, known as the Kuroshio Current and its extension, had the ability to carry the radioactive compounds across the Pacific Ocean in an easterly direction. Nevertheless, the concentration of radioactivity was not as high as originally believed.
The TC is because of conclude this year. A couple of results have caused concern. A field study they performed on 2 July 2014, revealed from 2 sets of seawater samples, discovered that 2 filter cartridges were covered, which showed elements of cesium, a radioactive compound.
Then recently, trace quantities of cesium-134 and cesium-137 showed up in samples gathered near Vancouver Island in British Columbia. The samples gathered were separate from the tracking project set up by IAEA but it is thought the only possible source of these radioactive components is Fukushima, according to the Integrated Fukushima Ocean Radionuclide Monitoring(InFORM) Network. This is the very first time that traces of cesium-134 had been identified near North America.
While these are trace quantities, the danger of radioactive product in any amount can not be ignored. However, the specialists say that these levels identified can not truly damage us, they are still lower than those we might be exposed to from an oral x-ray for example.
Having stated that, every possible exposure, in any percentage, accumulates. The issue with atomic energy and fallout, the radiation and radioactive materials can travel far and wide with the wind and with the sea. For that reason, we ought to agree on a global level to keep these levels at absolutely zero. In any event the constant monitoring of oceans will need to be conducted, according to Ken Buesseler, a marine chemist at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute.
What Buesseler states must be taken on board beyond 2015, especially since the guidance from the IAEA is to discard even more radioactive water into the sea. This is obviously better than holding it in tanks. Any discharge will need to be controlled and constant tracking would be needed, in specific near the plant to enhance data reliability. This is triggering concern and not simply to state authorities. Think about the fishermen. Whenever they capture fish in the ocean, the fish need to be checked for radioactivity.
Before any more discarding is done, the IAEA and Tokyo Electric Power Co., who control the plant, need to think about not only the ecological effect but socio-economic impact as well. Incomes might be impacted as well as long-lasting health of the area and internationally ultimately.
Thanks for taking the time to read this article. If you found this information helpful, please share it with your friends and family. Your support in our endeavor of sharing free information would be much appreciated.
You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Deprogram Yourself