Everyone with kids knows the drill. Your brand new baby is expected to be seen at 2-, 4-, and 6- month “well baby” check-ups where an array of toxic syringes will be lined up and pressured on unsuspecting parents. The pediatrician will not disclose the numerous risks or documented deaths and injuries associated with these shots. Your doctor will likely fail to mention that the CDC is a corrupt agency that should not be trusted due to blatant evidence tampering and the omission of unfavorable data. Your child’s doctor, the person you have entrusted with the health of your precious baby, will definitely not disclose that combined multiple childhood vaccines have never once been safety tested.
A brand new article in a well-respected medical journal should make everyone take pause as to what we are allowing to be done to our children in the name of immunity from diseases which are largely inconsequential in the age of modern medicine and sanitation. The Journal’s article is especially frightening considering mandatory vaccine laws, including California’s heinous S.B.277, are in the works in states all over the country. Parental rights are being eroded in a hostile, pharmaceutical takeover, and it is our children’s educations that will be denied unless we concede to the CDC’s full vaccination schedule of nearly 6 dozen vaccines.
The following press release shockingly blows the lid off just one of the deliberate vaccine lies perpetuated by the CDC, our pediatricians, and the pharmaceutical industry. Please educate before you vaccinate.
(GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Multiple childhood vaccines are often given at one visit, but contrary to the claims of public health officials there is evidence that this practice is unsafe, writes medical research journalist Neil Z. Miller in the summer issue of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons.
Miller used data in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), jointly operated by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which was established in 1990. This contains about 500,000 reports of adverse events that occurred in association with, but not necessarily caused by vaccines. Miller acknowledges that health authorities often suggest that VAERS may be unreliable, but points out that CDC considers VAERS an important vaccine safety assessment tool and regularly conducts its own studies using VAERS data.
“Although CDC recommends polio, hepatitis B, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, rotavirus, Haemophilus influenzae type B, and pneumococcal vaccines for two-, four-, and six-month-old infants, this combination of eight vaccines administered during a single physician visit was never tested for safety in clinical trials,” Miller writes. “This is at odds with a CDC report which found that mixed exposures to chemical substances and other stress factors, including prescribed pharmaceuticals, may produce ‘increased or unexpected deleterious health effects.’”
Miller looked at the percentage of reported reactions that involved hospitalization or death as related to the number of vaccine doses the infant had received, and to the age of the infant.
“Our study showed that infants who receive several vaccines concurrently…are significantly more likely to be hospitalized or die when compared with infants who receive fewer vaccines simultaneously,” he writes. “It also showed that reported adverse effects were more likely to lead to hospitalization or death in younger infants.”
In infants receiving five or more vaccines concurrently, 5.4% of reported reactions were fatal, compared with 3.6% in those receiving four or fewer, the study shows.
“Parents and physicians should consider health options associated with a lower risk of hospitalization or death,” Miller concludes.
Miller also authored the book Miller’s Review of Critical Vaccine Studies: 400 Important Scientific Papers Summarized for Parents and Researchers.
The Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons is published by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS), a national organization representing physicians in all specialties since 1943.
Neil Z. Miller,
Jane M. Orient, M.D.,
To read the full article, please click here.
Thanks for taking the time to read this article. If you found this information helpful, please share it with your friends and family. Your support in our endeavor of sharing free information would be much appreciated.