Hillary Clinton sits at the center of a raging firestorm concerning her personal e-mail account and server established in her house from which top-secret info might have been deleted. But despite Bernie Sanders' noticeable anger with the "damn e-mails," the scandal just greatly heightened, when Judge Andrew Napolitano revealed on Monday that Russia has possession of approximately 20,000 of Clinton's emails-- exposing the possibility her removals might not have actually been irreversible after all.
“There’s a debate going on in the Kremlin between the Foreign Ministry and the Intelligence Services about whether they should release the 20,000 of Mrs. Clinton’s emails that they have hacked into,” Napolitano told Fox News' Megyn Kelly in an interview for The Kelly File.
With Clinton's repeated claims she used the individual e-mail server just for mundane communications and non-sensitive State matters having actually been shown outright lies, the deletions of 31,830 emails-- in the new context of Napolitano's statement-- have actually unexpectedly ended up being remarkably relevant.
As the FBI examination of Hillary Clinton's doubtful email practices grows, the concern of who had access to what details previously located on the previous secretary of state's server is now more critical than ever.
One such specific, Romanian hacker Guccifer, who was suddenly extradited to the United States, exposed he had easily and repeatedly accessed Clinton's personal server and he had not been the only one.
“For me, it was easy,” the hacker, whose given name is Marcel Lehel Lazar, exclusively told Fox News; “easy for me, for everybody.”
If Guccifer and Napolitano are right, Russia may, indeed, have possession of highly-sensitive info courtesy of Clinton's arrogant failure to stick to the commitment to use a government e-mail account during her period as secretary, a circumstance intensified by the now-mendacious claim no sensitive information had been sent through the personal account.
In reality, if Guccifer is to be taken seriously, as his extradition by the U.S. indicates news of the Kremlin having actually obtained potentially top-secret product might be the tip of a gigantic iceberg. Utilizing a readily offered program, the Romanian hacker also declared he observed “up to 10, like, IPs from other parts of the world” throughout sessions on Clinton's individual server. If just among those unidentified parties was linked to Russia, who the other 9 might be could be central to the FBI's decision whether or not to charge Clinton for mishandling categorized info.
Including yet another nail in the coffin against Hillary on Thursday, the Hill reported conservative watchdog Judicial Watch revealed, pursuant to a Liberty of Information Act request, frustration with technical troubles in acquiring a safe and secure phone line led the secretary to direct a leading aide to abandon the effort and call her without the necessary security in location.
“I give up. Call me on my home [number],” Clinton composed in a February 2009 email from the newly-released batch-- on the likewise notoriously unsecured server-- to then-chief of personnel, Cheryl Mills.
Though the email thread contains no verification such a call was ever made on the unsecured phone line, it evidences still more of the exact same flagrant neglect for national security obviously peppering Clinton's practices during her time at the State Department.
“This drip, drip of new Clinton emails show Hillary Clinton could not care less about the security of her communications,” noted Judicial Watch president, Tom Fitton, in a statement cited by the Hill. “How many other smoking gun emails are Hillary Clinton and her co-conspirators in the Obama administration hiding from the American people?”
For a putative presidential hopeful, Hillary Clinton definitely does not appear to appreciate the imperative for keeping matters of national security obscured from ... anybody.
Thanks for taking the time to read this article. If you found this information helpful, please share it with your friends and family. Your support in our endeavor of sharing free information would be much appreciated.
You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Deprogram Yourself